« Berman on Punishment and Justification | Main | Chandler on Insurance Contracts & "Genetic Modification" »

January 17, 2007

Comments

Mark Spottswood

A very enjoyable read. I think you are absolutely right about the virtues of short-form scholarship (not as a replacement for long-form, but as a very useful supplement to it) and about the importance of open-access.

I think, however, that disintermediation should be approached carefully. As you noted, there are real limits to the sophistication of search engines as search tools, and there is a very real possibility that a totally disintermediated world for scholarship would result in good work getting lost in the noise. I think that law review and peer editors serve really important functions in terms of verifying content and applying selection criteria that reduce search costs for scholars. Neither tool is perfect. And of course, tools like survey articles can work to provide subsitutes for editorial selection and review. But these sorts of substitutes are unlikely to serve as an adequate substitute for editorial review.

I think Alvin Goldman's thoughts on this subject are particularly useful (although he was writing in what has already become a radically different era of information technology). See Goldman, Knowledge in Social World, Ch. 6.

I think what is already emerging, and what is likely to be the norm going forward for quite some time, is a world combining some disintermediated scholarship by established people that gets read and respected, some disintermediated scholarship by unknown people that struggles to achieve recognition despite being of decent quality, due to search problems, and intermediated scholarship hosted by student or peer-reviewed journals that continues to be read because the editorial processes involved help to assure readers that it is of some utility.

But I suppose that in the end, we'll just have to wait and see.

Max

Prof. Solum,

I'll say this: as a practicing litigation and trial attorney (and not an appellate attorney), I have neither the time nor the inclination to read long-form, focus-audience approved articles hidden behind some expensive firewall. It's not because I don't care what some pointy-headed professor thinks -- I get some of my best arguments and ideas from pointy-headed professors. I just can't invest the time, money and energy into digging through what some editorial board thought was unique, not too controversial, and from a prestigeous enough author to publish in their little journal.

So, I read professor blogs, and I stay on top of the latest arguments. For instance, I have my fair share of cases alleging fraud. With your blog, I can see a new "the place of reliance in fraud" post and, presto, DIY CLE.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Tip Jar

Thank you!

Tip Jar

My Papers

July 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31