Tabatha Abu El-Haj (Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law) has posted Defining Nonviolence as a Matter of Law and Politics (Nomos, Volume LXII: Protest and Dissent, 2019) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Recent years have witnessed the reinvigoration of disruptive political protest — from the Occupy Movement, to Black Lives Matter, to the Women’s Marches. These sorts of disruptive outdoor assemblies, including many of their tactics, have been central to American politics since the Founding, and have long been protected by the First Amendment. Nevertheless, legislatures around the country have been introducing and passing bills that render a wide swath of protest tactics unlawful precisely because they have been effective in drawing attention to claims and issues that typically fall off the legislative radar. More important, these legislative efforts are part of a broader erosion of fundamental democratic norms — from partisan redistricting to rewriting legislative procedures and attacking the free press and the independence of the judiciary. Now more than ever, therefore, whatever our personal normative views of either the tactics of contemporary protesters or the parameters of current constitutional doctrine, it is our duty as a scholarly community to reaffirm that recent acts of protest and dissent operate well within the bounds of our American tradition of outdoor assembly and its constitutional protections.
Highly recommended.
